Text Practice Mode
TOEFL Writing First Task Practice #4
created Feb 16th, 05:06 by Hussain Ahmadi
2
309 words
37 completed
5
Rating visible after 3 or more votes
saving score / loading statistics ...
00:00
The reading passage attributes the decline in bee populations primarily to the use of pesticides, arguing that these chemicals disrupt bee navigation, reduce reproductive success, and ultimately cause colony collapse. However, the professor in the lecture presents a different perspective, suggesting that other factors play a more significant role in bee population decline.
First, while the reading states that pesticides harm bees by interfering with their ability to navigate, the professor refutes this claim by highlighting that areas with pesticide bans still experience bee population declines. He explains that in some regions where pesticides are not used, bees continue to disappear at similar rates. This suggests that other environmental factors may be responsible rather than pesticides alone.
Second, the reading argues that pesticides reduce the reproductive capabilities of bees, leading to fewer offspring and weaker colonies. In contrast, the professor challenges this argument by pointing out that some bee populations exposed to pesticides have remained stable. He asserts that diseases, specifically those caused by parasites, have been linked more directly to declining reproduction rates than pesticides. These parasites attack bee colonies, weakening them significantly and reducing their ability to survive.
Finally, the reading suggests that pesticide exposure causes colony collapse disorder (CCD), in which entire hives suddenly die. However, the lecture counters this by presenting research that implicates climate change and habitat destruction as more likely causes of CCD. The professor mentions that shifting temperatures and loss of natural habitats have put stress on bee populations, forcing them to migrate or struggle for food. He argues that these ecological pressures are more severe than the effects of pesticides.
In conclusion, while the reading blames pesticides for the decline in bee populations, the professor disputes this claim by citing evidence that suggests other factors, such as parasites, climate change, and habitat destruction, play a more crucial role in the phenomenon.
First, while the reading states that pesticides harm bees by interfering with their ability to navigate, the professor refutes this claim by highlighting that areas with pesticide bans still experience bee population declines. He explains that in some regions where pesticides are not used, bees continue to disappear at similar rates. This suggests that other environmental factors may be responsible rather than pesticides alone.
Second, the reading argues that pesticides reduce the reproductive capabilities of bees, leading to fewer offspring and weaker colonies. In contrast, the professor challenges this argument by pointing out that some bee populations exposed to pesticides have remained stable. He asserts that diseases, specifically those caused by parasites, have been linked more directly to declining reproduction rates than pesticides. These parasites attack bee colonies, weakening them significantly and reducing their ability to survive.
Finally, the reading suggests that pesticide exposure causes colony collapse disorder (CCD), in which entire hives suddenly die. However, the lecture counters this by presenting research that implicates climate change and habitat destruction as more likely causes of CCD. The professor mentions that shifting temperatures and loss of natural habitats have put stress on bee populations, forcing them to migrate or struggle for food. He argues that these ecological pressures are more severe than the effects of pesticides.
In conclusion, while the reading blames pesticides for the decline in bee populations, the professor disputes this claim by citing evidence that suggests other factors, such as parasites, climate change, and habitat destruction, play a more crucial role in the phenomenon.
