State vs. Ramesh Kumar is a significant criminal case where Ramesh Kumar was charged under Sections 302 (murder) and 201 (causing disappearance of evidence) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The case occurred on May 15, 2020, when Arun Kumar, the victim, went missing. Three days later, Arun’s body was discovered near a river, and the post-mortem report revealed that a severe head injury was the cause of death. The complainant, Sunil Kumar, accused Ramesh of committing the murder, claiming it was a result of a property dispute. During the police investigation, several critical pieces of evidence emerged. A blood-stained stone was found at the crime scene, and forensic analysis confirmed blood traces on Ramesh’s clothing. Additionally, Arun’s phone records placed his last location near Ramesh’s house. Witnesses testified to seeing Ramesh and Arun arguing on the day of the incident. The victim’s wife provided further testimony, highlighting the property dispute as a probable motive for the crime. However, Ramesh Kumar pleaded not guilty, asserting that he was at home at the time of the incident. The defense argued that the police had not conducted a thorough investigation and had relied solely on circumstantial evidence to frame Ramesh as the accused. Based on the evidence presented, including eyewitness accounts and forensic findings, the Sessions Court found Ramesh Kumar guilty. The court sentenced him to life imprisonment under Section 302 and an additional five years under Section 201 of the IPC. This case underscores the critical role of forensic evidence and witness testimony in the criminal justice process. It also highlights the need for peaceful resolution of property disputes through legal means. Furthermore, the case illustrates the judiciary’s responsibility to ensure that precise evidence and a fair trial lead to the punishment of offenders.