While punishment stands as the predominant global response to crime, some argue that education could be a more efficacious alternative. In my view, while this perspective is not without merit, it is crucial to recognise that deterrence remains the foundational and irreplaceable principle in all legal systems. Proponents of education-driven crime reduction rightly contend that many criminal acts stem from systemic societal issues. There can be little debate over the fact that crime is overwhelmingly driven by necessity. Individuals with limited alternatives in life are more likely to perceive criminal activity as a viable option. Through comprehensive education and ensuring, at the very least, a high school level of education for every citizen, governments can effectively eradicate this motivation. This approach, exemplified by education-centric nations such as Singapore, manifests in lower crime rates. Strategic investment in education not only fosters upward mobility and meritocracy but also underpins a robust economy where individuals achieve prosperity through lawful means, mitigating the allure of criminal activities. However, the adoption of educational solutions is encumbered by its substantial cost and time-intensive nature. In contrast, the simplicity of punishment as a deterrence cannot be overlooked. Moreover, the argument that white-collar crimes often involve individuals with higher educational backgrounds underscores the limitations of education in completely eradicating criminal behaviours. There are many justifications cited for punishment, but the most basic is the need to deter future would-be criminals. While imprisoning offenders may not reverse their past actions, it stands as a formidable deterrent against future would-be criminals. The absence or leniency of punitive measures could foreseeably lead to an exponential surge in crime rates. Hence, punishment, as a preventative measure, remains a pragmatic response to the perennial challenge of crime. In summation, acknowledging the potency of education in addressing root causes of crime, the more effective preventative countermeasure is a synergistic blend of education and punishment. Striking a balance between these approaches ensures a holistic strategy in creating a society less predisposed to criminal behaviour.