eng
competition

Text Practice Mode

SAI COMPUTER TYPING INSTITUTE, GULABARA CHHINDWARA [M.P.] CPCT ADMISSION OPEN [संचालक-लकी श्रीवात्री] MOB.-9098909565

created Nov 18th 2023, 04:53 by sandhya shrivatri


2


Rating

503 words
9 completed
00:00
Each State has its own judiciary which administers both union and State laws. It is set in hierarchical pattern. At the apex of the State judiciary is the High Court, which is the highest court of appeal and revision in the State for civil and criminal matters, including the wide powers, both administrative and judicial, over the subordinate judiciary. The present Constitution of India makes a number of provisions concerning the High Courts though it is not the place to expound the full ramifications of these provisions as the matter falls more appropriately within the realm of Constitution law, yet a general picture of the High Court as it emerges there under may be painted here.
The Constitution recognized all the existing High Courts. It provided a High Court for each State. The Parliament is empowered to establish a common High Court for two or more States or Union territories. The High Court is a court of record and as such can punish for its contempt. It is not subject to the superintendence of any Court or authority, though appeals from its decisions may lie to the Supreme Court. It consists of a Chief Justice and as many Judges as the President of India may sanction. At Present sanctioned strength of Hon'ble Judges of Allahabad High Court is 95.
The Chief Justice is Incharge of the administrative work of the Court and distributes judicial work among his companion Judges. He is also consulted in the appointment of judges in his own court. But while sitting in court, his judicial status is no higher than that of any other Judge and his decision can be reversed by any two judges in Special Appeal, and if sitting on a bench of three judges, he can be over-ruled by his colleagues. He has no administrative control over any judge and his status may be described as primus inter pares first among equals.
A person to be eligible for appointment as a High Court Judge must be a citizen of India and must either have held a judicial office for at least ten years or has been an advocate of high court for at least ten years. Comparing this provision with the qualifications prescribed formerly for the High Court Judge under the Government of India Act, 1935, the following changes would appear to have been made in this respect. A barrister is not entitled ipso facto to be appointed as a High Court Judge; he can be so appointed only when he has been practicing in a High Court or has held a judicial office for at least ten years; the period of judicial service qualifying a person to be appointed as a High Court Judge has been raised from five to ten years; a civil servant can now be appointed to the High Court only if he has held a judicial office for ten years previously, a civil servant became eligible for the High Court Judgeship after acting as a District Judge for three years.  
 

saving score / loading statistics ...