eng
competition

Text Practice Mode

ROHIT TYPING CENTER (RTC) CHAKIYA RAJROOPUR PRAYAGRAJ U.P Allahabad High Court RO,ARO, 500 word english contact: 8299289045

created Oct 22nd 2021, 10:22 by Rohit kumar


7


Rating

518 words
26 completed
00:00
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
?Court No. - 52
 
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 4832 of 2019
 
Appellant :-Hasrat
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Anr.
Counsel for Appellant :-KaustubhSrivastava,KandarpSrivastava
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,AnoopSingh,Gaurav Singh Chauhan
 
Hon'bleNeerajTiwari,J.
In this case, on previous occasions too, illness slips were sent by learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 and case was listed peremptorily on so many dates.  
The instant criminal appeal under section 14 A(2) of SC/ST (P.A. Act), 1989 is targeted against the order dated 09.07.2019 passed by learned Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Bulandshahar in case crime no. 644 of 2017, Under Sections 302, 452 IPC and Section 3(2)V SC/ST Act, P.S. Gulawati, District- Bulandshahar is seeking enlargement on bail during the trial. @#$%  
Learned counsel for the applicant-appellant in support of his application for bail submits that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the case. It is further submitted that the prompt FIR was lodged on 27.10.2017 by one Naresh, under sections 302, 452 IPC against Hasan son of Aas Mohammad and Mahkaar son of Bheema. Name of the applicant-appellants figured up after 15 days of the incident when the~ informant has given in writing to the Investigating Officer referring to the statement recorded under section 161 Cr.P.C. of his small kid Shiva, aged about 6-7 years. who in his statement under section 161 Cr.P.C. has stated that he has not seen the applicant-appellant but has identified after hearing his voice. The appellant has no criminal history.&^%*^ <0000123456789>?  
Either Personally Or Through His/Her Counsel. In Case Of His/Her Absence, Without Sufficient Cause, The Trial Court May Proceed Against Him/Her Under Section 229-AIpc.
(Iii) In Case, The Applicant Misuses The Liberty Of Bail During Trial And In Order To Secure His/Her Presence Proclamation Under Section 82 Cr.P.C., May Be Issued And If Applicant Fails To Appear Before The Court On The Date Fixed In Such Proclamation, Then, The Trial Court Shall Initiate Proceedings Against Him/Her, In Accordance With Law, Under Section 174-A Ipc.
(Iv) The Applicant Shall Remain Present, In Person, Before The Trial Court On Dates Fixed For (1) Opening Of The Case, (2) Framing Of Charge And (3) Recording Of Statement Under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If In The Opinion Of The Trial Court Absence Of The Applicant Is Deliberate Or Without Sufficient Cause, Then It Shall Be Open For The Trial Court To Treat Such Default As Abuse Of Liberty Of Bail And Proceed Against The Him/Her In Accordance With Law. Rohit typing center/\||||2323 555 666 88 00000 013456789 0147895623.
However, It Is Made Clear That Any Wilful Violation Of Above Conditions By The Applicant, Shall Have Serious Repercussion On His/Her Bail So Granted By This Court And The Trial Court Is At Liberty To Cancel The Bail, After Recording The Reasons For Doing So, In The Given Case Of Any Of The Condition Mentioned Above. °  
The IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 09.07.2019 PASSED BY LEARNED Special Judge, Sc/St Act, Bulandshahar In Case Crime No. 644 Of 2017, Under Sections 302, 452 Ipc And Section.
 
 

saving score / loading statistics ...