Cheaters
Re: Cheaters
hello, is this guy cheating? but only 80 wpm:
http://10fastfingers.com/user/397255/
also.... just curious about this guy (he just made a new account):
http://10fastfingers.com/user/397076/
http://10fastfingers.com/user/397255/
also.... just curious about this guy (he just made a new account):
http://10fastfingers.com/user/397076/
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 3:54 pm
Re: Cheaters
i got reported for being a cheater, why would you ban right away?
im not a cheater i can take any test you want , ofc my wpm will raise in competition because its the same words all over again and im prepared to what im going to type .
on normal tests i am making high scores im not always logged even in my logged i reached 160.
and yes i am new user because ihave used your website as typing for fun and then i decided to log .
every new user should be slow ?
anyway give me a test and i will prove whatever you want .remove the ban .
im not a cheater i can take any test you want , ofc my wpm will raise in competition because its the same words all over again and im prepared to what im going to type .
on normal tests i am making high scores im not always logged even in my logged i reached 160.
and yes i am new user because ihave used your website as typing for fun and then i decided to log .
every new user should be slow ?
anyway give me a test and i will prove whatever you want .remove the ban .
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 3:54 pm
-
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2013 1:20 pm
Re: Cheaters
So when you ban people, it is based on suspicion and if things look strange and not a program that detects bots/programs used to cheat?
Re: Cheaters
@soweird1989: You was banned because you have exceeded 180 WPM in 2 English competitions (out of the 3 that you have taken) while your average is 125 WPM in normal. Competitions are certainly easier, but such a gap (60 words!) is far too large to be credible.
@Impermanence: Whenever possible, any ban is based on facts. If there is only suspicion, doubt benefits the user. The moderation team has additional information not included in the profiles. But I will say no more for obvious reasons.
@Impermanence: Whenever possible, any ban is based on facts. If there is only suspicion, doubt benefits the user. The moderation team has additional information not included in the profiles. But I will say no more for obvious reasons.
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 3:54 pm
Re: Cheaters
My average is low only because sometimes i let my friends type or just mess around or do things slowly to memorize.
and it affect the final score when i do my real tests i am between 140-180 always in tests , some of them outside of my user. just its a new user and i havent really tried since then. i have done 160 easily ..
seriously you really think i am going hysteric about every test? i think you should ban a few guys with 180 wpm because their lowest is 20 wpm ...
how can be 20wpm lowest and highest 180 duno ..
anyway i dont really care if i have a user or not im typing for fun its just lame that this is how you ran things and sad how people are jealous just because they lost the competition . gl .
and it affect the final score when i do my real tests i am between 140-180 always in tests , some of them outside of my user. just its a new user and i havent really tried since then. i have done 160 easily ..
seriously you really think i am going hysteric about every test? i think you should ban a few guys with 180 wpm because their lowest is 20 wpm ...
how can be 20wpm lowest and highest 180 duno ..
anyway i dont really care if i have a user or not im typing for fun its just lame that this is how you ran things and sad how people are jealous just because they lost the competition . gl .
Re: Cheaters
The only way to prove what you say is to record a video at a speed of at least 160 WPM, in any mode, with your screen, your hands and clicking sound.