Cheaters

Help and information regarding the 10FF website.
jace888

Re: Cheaters

Post by jace888 » Sun May 07, 2017 11:20 am

ethereal wrote:
Tue Apr 25, 2017 8:44 pm
https://10fastfingers.com/user/1023389/

The up-and-down trend is interesting, but perhaps the most concerning thing is his most recent test, 150wpm with 32 mistakes. Also worth noting, the amount of mistakes made is steadily increasing among his tests.
Could just be sharing his account on the same PC?

ethereal

Re: Cheaters

Post by ethereal » Sun May 07, 2017 4:53 pm

jace888 wrote:
Sun May 07, 2017 11:20 am
ethereal wrote:
Tue Apr 25, 2017 8:44 pm
https://10fastfingers.com/user/1023389/

The up-and-down trend is interesting, but perhaps the most concerning thing is his most recent test, 150wpm with 32 mistakes. Also worth noting, the amount of mistakes made is steadily increasing among his tests.
Could just be sharing his account on the same PC?
Yes, but the greater concern is that they were regularly typing in excess of 150-160wpm with 20+ mistakes.

Kanto-Dream
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 4:26 pm

Re: Cheaters

Post by Kanto-Dream » Mon May 08, 2017 7:57 am

Actually, it is absolutely possible to reach 150/160+ with 20+ mistakes (and even easier to reach than 150/160 with less than 5 mistakes)
I am not a moderator, but I don't think this is any kind of suspicious.

Even if the account is not shared and he actually is a cheater, there is no obvious proof that he is one


User avatar
Linsk
Posts: 1002
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 6:24 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Re: Cheaters

Post by Linsk » Mon May 08, 2017 11:59 am

User 1377251 banned.

ethereal

Re: Cheaters

Post by ethereal » Tue May 09, 2017 2:27 pm

Kanto-Dream wrote:
Mon May 08, 2017 7:57 am
Actually, it is absolutely possible to reach 150/160+ with 20+ mistakes (and even easier to reach than 150/160 with less than 5 mistakes)
I am not a moderator, but I don't think this is any kind of suspicious.

Even if the account is not shared and he actually is a cheater, there is no obvious proof that he is one
It's possible but suspicious nonetheless, which is why I posted his account.

viper.khadem
Posts: 79
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 9:40 am
Location: Iran

Re: Cheaters

Post by viper.khadem » Fri May 12, 2017 10:16 am


User avatar
Linsk
Posts: 1002
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 6:24 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Re: Cheaters

Post by Linsk » Fri May 12, 2017 11:24 am

User 1379978 banned.

ethereal

Re: Cheaters

Post by ethereal » Sat May 13, 2017 12:25 am

https://10fastfingers.com/user/839922/

The 133wpm with no mistakes or corrections is suspicious, especially considering his other scores have at least 10 corrections. Could just be a lucky test, but it's worth revision.

viper.khadem
Posts: 79
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 9:40 am
Location: Iran

Re: Cheaters

Post by viper.khadem » Tue May 16, 2017 2:29 pm


Post Reply