Could just be sharing his account on the same PC?ethereal wrote: ↑Tue Apr 25, 2017 8:44 pmhttps://10fastfingers.com/user/1023389/
The up-and-down trend is interesting, but perhaps the most concerning thing is his most recent test, 150wpm with 32 mistakes. Also worth noting, the amount of mistakes made is steadily increasing among his tests.
Cheaters
Re: Cheaters
Re: Cheaters
Yes, but the greater concern is that they were regularly typing in excess of 150-160wpm with 20+ mistakes.jace888 wrote: ↑Sun May 07, 2017 11:20 amCould just be sharing his account on the same PC?ethereal wrote: ↑Tue Apr 25, 2017 8:44 pmhttps://10fastfingers.com/user/1023389/
The up-and-down trend is interesting, but perhaps the most concerning thing is his most recent test, 150wpm with 32 mistakes. Also worth noting, the amount of mistakes made is steadily increasing among his tests.
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 4:26 pm
Re: Cheaters
Actually, it is absolutely possible to reach 150/160+ with 20+ mistakes (and even easier to reach than 150/160 with less than 5 mistakes)
I am not a moderator, but I don't think this is any kind of suspicious.
Even if the account is not shared and he actually is a cheater, there is no obvious proof that he is one
I am not a moderator, but I don't think this is any kind of suspicious.
Even if the account is not shared and he actually is a cheater, there is no obvious proof that he is one
-
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 9:40 am
- Location: Iran
Re: Cheaters
It's possible but suspicious nonetheless, which is why I posted his account.Kanto-Dream wrote: ↑Mon May 08, 2017 7:57 amActually, it is absolutely possible to reach 150/160+ with 20+ mistakes (and even easier to reach than 150/160 with less than 5 mistakes)
I am not a moderator, but I don't think this is any kind of suspicious.
Even if the account is not shared and he actually is a cheater, there is no obvious proof that he is one
-
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 9:40 am
- Location: Iran
Re: Cheaters
https://10fastfingers.com/user/839922/
The 133wpm with no mistakes or corrections is suspicious, especially considering his other scores have at least 10 corrections. Could just be a lucky test, but it's worth revision.
The 133wpm with no mistakes or corrections is suspicious, especially considering his other scores have at least 10 corrections. Could just be a lucky test, but it's worth revision.
-
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 9:40 am
- Location: Iran