Cheaters
-
Impermanence
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2013 1:20 pm
Re: Cheaters
1. http://10fastfingers.com/user/195262/
76 competitions played in 11 months and never won a single one, except two recent, suspicious ones: 184 WPM and 171 WPM
His average is 104-127 in regular tests.
76 competitions played in 11 months and never won a single one, except two recent, suspicious ones: 184 WPM and 171 WPM
His average is 104-127 in regular tests.
-
Impermanence
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2013 1:20 pm
Re: Cheaters
1. http://10fastfingers.com/user/8377/
Old member turned cheater.
More than doubled his previous competition score of 101 (204 WPM).
Old member turned cheater.
More than doubled his previous competition score of 101 (204 WPM).
Re: Cheaters
Hi,
On what basis is this handled? all my stats in a T ornament and 24hr Ladder have been made invis? I average 135-160 norm and peaked at 193, and I presume this is on the basis that It's a new account? which if it is the case is stupid - Can you confirm.
Note - I have not been banned or reduced, just made invisible.
Mark
On what basis is this handled? all my stats in a T ornament and 24hr Ladder have been made invis? I average 135-160 norm and peaked at 193, and I presume this is on the basis that It's a new account? which if it is the case is stupid - Can you confirm.
Note - I have not been banned or reduced, just made invisible.
Mark
Re: Cheaters
This website and Forum is borderline Pathetic, what simple minders such as a few above don't realise is if you don't finish a test it doesn't count as an attempt, If I make a mistake in mine, I cancel out and retry as I'm only interested in what I can achieve on a good run - Banning people for simply being better than you is nothing but jealously, and if anything sad.
My username is Bucko, on a normal run I go from a low 120 to 130, and on a good run 140 and peak about 170, and have reached 193 through having a great choice of words to type - Stupid to be made invisible because of a system you created, not all fast typists are cheats.
My username is Bucko, on a normal run I go from a low 120 to 130, and on a good run 140 and peak about 170, and have reached 193 through having a great choice of words to type - Stupid to be made invisible because of a system you created, not all fast typists are cheats.
Re: Cheaters
Hi Bucko,
If you're invisible in the rankings, that means you're banned. Let me be clear, nobody is banned for the sole reason that his account is "new" or that he's faster than the others.
Now, if you have a complaint to make, I suggest you change your tone and be more polite, and we will be more inclined to answer or help you.
Anyway, without your profile or your user ID, nothing can be done. ^^
If you're invisible in the rankings, that means you're banned. Let me be clear, nobody is banned for the sole reason that his account is "new" or that he's faster than the others.
Now, if you have a complaint to make, I suggest you change your tone and be more polite, and we will be more inclined to answer or help you.
Anyway, without your profile or your user ID, nothing can be done. ^^
Re: Cheaters
"I suggest you be more polite", because of your such superiority that you are,a forum moderator for a typing website - My point is not insulting, other than calling it simple minded to ban/temp ban an account purely on scores, without any reasoning, which I know is not given as I created the account, did one test and got banned a few hours later. Any notification? no, any justification? no, which is not surprising as it cannot be justified.
This is not aimed at you directly, and by no means am I mad, its the lack of moderation - a cheeky 5 hours to correct your own mistake.
It's a great site, but really, a forum called cheaters where people point out players with a bizzare spike in wpm? is this really how far intelligence stretches.
anyway - Thankyou for your response I have just deleted and re-created my account to avoid the dreaded wait time, I think I will deliberately fail and increase it slowly to avoid any future mistakes
This is not aimed at you directly, and by no means am I mad, its the lack of moderation - a cheeky 5 hours to correct your own mistake.
It's a great site, but really, a forum called cheaters where people point out players with a bizzare spike in wpm? is this really how far intelligence stretches.
anyway - Thankyou for your response I have just deleted and re-created my account to avoid the dreaded wait time, I think I will deliberately fail and increase it slowly to avoid any future mistakes
-
Impermanence
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2013 1:20 pm
Re: Cheaters
1. http://10fastfingers.com/user/427474/
232 WPM 0 mistakes 0 corrections.
Previous high = 108 WPM with mistakes.
232 WPM 0 mistakes 0 corrections.
Previous high = 108 WPM with mistakes.